Public anger was monopolized by the Rhodesian Michael Rousseau this week.But allow me to recall a scandalous situation which was overshadowed on Wednesday, the day of the CEOs of the Air Speak White airline.
Publié le 7 nov. 2021It was Marie-Eve Morass who released the news that symbolizes excess of concrete employment security for life, jealously defended by the unions, Wednesday morning.The title: "A harassment concierge was able to rage for 10 years".
Lisez l’article de Marie-Eve MorasseThe guy worked for the Marguerite-Bourgeoys school board.Words and touches unwanted with buttocks and size, the genre to make massages to women without being asked.The genre to give a teacher a sexual connotation vacation memory by telling her that he had thought a lot of her this summer ...
In short, a pig mononcle.
The guy received disciplinary opinions.Repeat.He received two "last chances" under a protocol signed with his union, the local section 1208 of the SCFP.
As in the time of pedophile priests, it was sent to another school when the situation became untenable in the school where it was affected.And he started to be raised again, in the same way.
We even sent him to therapy, in which the school board participated, "by explaining the situation in his therapist," said my Morachic colleague in her surreal paper.
The concierge has always continued to touch women, to make them uncomfortable, to accumulate complaints.
Ten years. Ten years de ça.About twenty harassed women, touched.
The Marguerite-Bourgeoys School Board had time to become the Marguerite-Bourgeoys school service center before the pig monuncle was ultimately and officially dismissed last September.
I draw your attention to a passage of the article, capital: "The Marguerite-Bourgeoys school service center says it has acted" promptly "and specifies that" collective agreements provide for a prescription of the disciplinary measures given to an employee after a period12 months ”.»»
Let me translate this to you in French: the employee who receives a disciplinary opinion (say) on January 15, well, this disciplinary opinion disappears on January 15 of the following year.
Let's say that on January 15, the disciplinary opinion disappears.Let's say that on January 16, the employee reproys the buttocks of another teacher.You follow ?Well, when the employer will sanction the employee, he will sanction an employee who is deemed to have never stuck the buttocks of a colleague: his file is virgin in the matter since January 15 ...
It's not a joke. C’est ça, la « prescription»».
The employer will therefore not be able to bring back to the carpet the first episode of dummy when it is a question of determining the sentence for the second plot episode.
I discovered this invisibility cape a few years ago, when I investigated a teacher from a Montreal school who has terrorized children for fifteen years. L’utilisation du verbe « terroriser»» n’est pas faite à la légère, croyez-moi. Quand j’ai contacté une mère dont la fille désormais adulte avait naguère fréquenté l’école, elle a crié : « Mon Dieu, quelle horreur !»» quand je lui ai dit que je l’appelais au sujet de l’enseignante X.
Lisez la chronique « Si l’école était importante (5)»» publiée en 2015
Well, this teacher who psychologically harassment of elementary students, who lowered them and humiliated them, cried out on them and commanded homework that she did not correct was valiantly defended for years by the Alliance des Profs de Montreal.
Chaque avis disciplinaire était « prescrit»», en effet : après quelques mois, l’avis disparaissait, et quand un autre parent se plaignait, eh bien, la direction faisait face à une enseignante dont le dossier était… vierge.
Yes, it's crazy, I know.
Finally, because the press was investigating, because the newspaper was going to publish this surrealist story, Boum, the Montreal School Board and the alliance of the teachers agreed with a deal.They moved the crazy teacher, they sent her to another school.
I know, I know ... the unions will tell me that the labor code forces them to defend everyone.Of course, of course.
But ... someone heard Quebec unions say that this obligation forces them to defend rotten?Not me.
Is there a union leader who has raised his hand publicly, in recent years, to say that current laws and regulations-which allow for example a harassment concierge to escape the dismissal for ten years-should be reviewed?
C’est comme les syndicats qui préparent les griefs pour contester l’« intolérable»» désir du patronat de protéger les lieux de travail en obligeant les travailleurs à se faire vacciner : je n’en ai pas entendu un cr**** dire que ces griefs étaient déposés à contrecœur.
Not one.
So, I want, the legal framework.But the union world seems to accommodate it quite well, to do everything.
I note in finishing that the local section 1208 of the SCFP which represents the blue passes of the Marguerite-Bourgeoys school service center could have commented publicly, he could have said that he had unfortunately been forced to defend this Pogneux concierge ...
The local section 1208 could have declared that it might be necessary to rethink the laws and regulations which allow rotten to be raised for years, like this concierge.
But no. Not one mot.Radio silence.
I quote the article by Marie-Eve Morass: “The CSSMB Blue Colus Syndicate, which represents the concierge, did not recall the press, while the teaching union of the west of Montreal did notnot wanted to grant us interview.»»
Isn't that extraordinary?
That the blue collar union is embarrassed to speak, it is one thing.Maybe I would hide, too, in place of its president, Claude Bélanger.
But that the union which represents the 20 teachers who suffered the abuse of the dark concierge also in the omerta shows how strong union solidarity is: especially should not condemn a unionized comrade who was defended by other comrades!
Now imagine how these two unions would be climbed in the curtains, if the harasser was a boss.It would take three fire trucks to get them to drop out of the curtains.
But when he's a comrade, the harasser?Ah, there, it is not the same: all the unions close their mouths, in a copy effort of solidarity.
