Bonjour Gaspard
Article provocateur mais intéressant, il braque le projecteur sur l’angle aveugle du discours de JMJ : les aspects politiques et sociétaux.
Unless I am error JMJ intends to manage the energy shock by nuclear without mentioning the availability of cooling water within the framework of climate change, neither the state/private ratio in the farm/security, nor the availability of uranium enriched for 3rd reactorsgeneration.The IAEA estimates global demand for uranium at 100-140 kt/year (2035) but the IPP of Zurich estimates a mining production of 41,000 t/year (2030).Why make 3rd gen reactors.?There is an urgency to make overweight to enhance our fertile uranium stock.
https://arxiv.org/abs/1106.3617
http://www.iaea.org/newscenter/pressreleases/2012/prn201219.html
Living conditions (hygiene, unhealthy habitat, alcoholism, etc.) had a strong weight in life expectancy.To do a little genealogy, many people lived up to 80 years in the 18th century as these pitfalls were avoided.We will never return to the 18th century conditions because knowledge has been acquired since: health, safety of workers as well as all political and societal aspects, untreated by IPV, of our living environment.
Without doing the lesson, our modern Western life in the 21st century is sometimes paid for living conditions worthy of the 18th century in certain countries suppliers of raw material.For those who have traveled, it is obvious.
